Monarchy and Political Adaption

-
A large part of the answer to this question, though not all of it, has to do with the ability or willingness of the particular monarch and their successors to accept a progressive reduction in their political power.

The classic example is that of England, following the establishment of William and Mary on the throne in 1689. Their coronation was contingent on their acceptance of parliamentary supremacy over the monarchy in the critical areas of public policy which includes taxation, finances, the military and its command, and the religion adopted by the monarch (This agreement between the English parliament and the monarch may be thought of as a social contract, although it was a social contract that excluded the participation of the majority of the people).

Much of the subsequent political history England is the story of the increasing power of the parliament, especially the House of Commons, along with the declining power of monarchy.

Today, it is fair to say that the British King and Queen reigns rather than rules and that the primary functions of the monarchy are symbolic. It represents the continuity of the British traditions and serves as a focal point for the loyalties of British citizens.

Most contemporary monarchies have remained important institutions in their societies precisely because a succession of kings and queens have reconcile themselves to declining political significance. As in war, one may have to surrender in order to survive.

This contrasts vividly with the histories of monarchical institutions in France during the 18th and 19th centuries, in Russia during the first decades of the 20th century, and in Egypt and Iran in the mind-20th century. In these and the other countries that have eliminated their monarchies, royal authority proved unable or unwilling to alter its political functions along with political and social changes.

Typically, the monarch clung tenaciously to power and failed to encourage the development of parliamentary autonomy and exercise of executive authority by political leaders are not accountable to the throne. The king's reward for his intransigence was the loss of his life and the lives of his family and loyal supporters.

The faith of the Russian tsar also illustrates the point. Forced by the revolution of 1905 to convene a parliament or Duma, Tsar Nicholas II nevertheless manipulated its representation to get the results he wanted, censored the speeches of its delegates and refused the advice of his government ministers. The tsar's insistence on ruling according to the outdated notion of the "divine right of the Kings", which made him "accountable only to God" was especially intolerable in the context of his mismanagement of Russia's military participation in the First World War.

In fact, we might hypothesize that the more a monarch resists any reduction in his authority, the more likely that he is to be replaced or overthrown by a revolutionary regime that employs widespread violence to root out the vestiges of monarchical and aristocratic domination. This hypothesis helps to explain events as widely separated as those in England in 1640, in France in 1789 and 1848, in Russia in 1917, Egypt in 1952 and Iran after 1979.

Popular posts from this blog

What has MCA done to the Chinese community in Malaysia?

-
Image
We guess, many of you would be wondering why are we asking such question, “What has MCA done to the Chinese community in Malaysia?” Obviously, none of us would ever realize the real and terrible impact that MCA has made onto the Malaysian Chinese and if they were to see this, the definite question too would be, “done what?”, “don’t know”, “not aware”, “none of our business”, or even, “we don't want to know at all”. The inception of MCA in 1949 can be traced back from the origins of the Chinese Kuomintang (KMT) and its chapter in the then Malaya, which was famously known as Kuomintang Malaya (KMT Malaya). In aftermath of the Second World War and the defeat of the KMT forces in China in 1949, the KMT Malaya has began to move towards transforming its Malayan chapter into a local Chinese based organization in order to preserve its existence and long term political opportunity in this county. And this is how MCA was born in February 1949, where the party later teamed up
Read more

Perlukah sesebuah gabungan parti politik kekal secara wajib?

-
Image
Daripada keadaan politik dalam negara ini, kita telahpun dan sedang memerhati beberapa buah gabungan parti-parti politik yang terkini, iaitu Barisan Nasional (BN) yang kekal begitu lama dengan parti komponen utama Umno memonopoli semua aspek keputusan di dalam gabungan dan kerajaan yang diterajui oleh mereka. Di pihak Pakatan Rakyat (PR) pula ianya merupakan sebuah gabungan parti-parti pembangkang utama, PKR, DAP dan PAS yang bekerjasama secara longgar dan masing-masing mempunyai kedudukan yang setaraf di antara satu sama lain. Di tengah-tengah kancah cabar mencabar di antara BN dan PR, terdapat satu lagi alternatif yang kini sedang menonjol, Gabungan Kiri Malaysia (GKM) yang merangkumi gabungan parti politik bercampur dengan pertubuhan-pertubuhan bukan kerajaan (NGO) yang kini dianggotai oleh Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM), sebagai peneraju utama GKM, diikuti dengan Solidariti Anak Muda Malaysia (SAMM), Pusat Sejarah Rakyat dan Collective Intelligence serta beberapa individu yang te
Read more

Seek for quick success and instant benefits

-
By Soong Phui Jee The people's first reaction to the SMK Sacred Heart's practice of rewarding a brand new Perodua Myvi car to the Best Teacher and Best Student of the school was, would it cause the deterioration of education? After awarding cars today, would they give diamond rings or sport cars tomorrow? Awarding such expensive gifts for students might distort the purpose of education. If children study only to receive gifts and rewards, would they understand the true meaning of studying? Would they study for themselves, or to receive material rewards? In fact, not only the above mentioned school, but many other schools nationwide have gradually tended to seek for quick success and instant benefits. For example, some of the so-called "elite schools" stress much on examination results and refuse to let students with poor results take government examinations to prevent them from pulling down the school's average grade. Shouldn't schools teach all childr
Read more