Government by the few

-
Even when the divine right of the kings or sultans were an acceptable formula for legitimating royal authority, it was nevertheless true that the monarch depended on the support of a loyal cadre of advisers and bureaucrats to carry out his policies.

It was the gradual evolution and institutionalization of the roles of advisers and civil servants that, in France and elsewhere, led to the establishment of the parliament (advisers) and the state's administrative apparatus (civil servants). An awareness of these historical trends, along with the conviction that democratic institutions are an illusion that conceals the political domination of a minority, has convinced some 20th century political scientists that government everywhere and always has been the affair of a few - neither one nor the many.

In this context, aristocracy means government by an elite of the society that has high social status, wealth, fame and political power. These advantages are passed down from one generation of aristocracy to another. Status, power, fame and wealth are inherited. We may also say that in aristocratic societies, status is allowed according to "ascriptive" rather than "achievement" norms: Your place in society is determined by who you are or who your parents are rather than by what you do. Who you are is indicated by your styles of speech, dress and comportment; your family background; where you were educated and your ability to live a comfortable life without having to work for it.

No wonder that workers, peasants and intellectuals in most societies have registered such a low regard for aristocrats and the aristocratic institutions.Where an aristocratic class is politically dominant is also where invariably, monarchical institutions will be found. In England in 1820 for instance, the monarchy was still a politically significant institution, the upper house (House of Lords) exercised major influence in the legislative process and fewer than 500 citizens most of them peers in the House of Lords were able to elect a majority of members to the House of Commons.

Even after the passage of the Reform Bill of 1832, the suffrage did not extend to more than 12 percent of all adult males in England. But after the Reform Bill of 1867, 30 percent of all adult males were enfranchised and it may be said that at this point in time, the politics of Great Britain were controlled less by an aristocracy than by an oligarchy.

Oligarchy means a government by a minority of the society, a minority that is not necessarily distinguished by aristocratic title or privilege. But in the middle of 19th century, Great Britain also could have been described as plutocracy, which means rule by a few who are wealthy.

Popular posts from this blog

What has MCA done to the Chinese community in Malaysia?

-
Image
We guess, many of you would be wondering why are we asking such question, “What has MCA done to the Chinese community in Malaysia?” Obviously, none of us would ever realize the real and terrible impact that MCA has made onto the Malaysian Chinese and if they were to see this, the definite question too would be, “done what?”, “don’t know”, “not aware”, “none of our business”, or even, “we don't want to know at all”. The inception of MCA in 1949 can be traced back from the origins of the Chinese Kuomintang (KMT) and its chapter in the then Malaya, which was famously known as Kuomintang Malaya (KMT Malaya). In aftermath of the Second World War and the defeat of the KMT forces in China in 1949, the KMT Malaya has began to move towards transforming its Malayan chapter into a local Chinese based organization in order to preserve its existence and long term political opportunity in this county. And this is how MCA was born in February 1949, where the party later teamed up
Read more

Perlukah sesebuah gabungan parti politik kekal secara wajib?

-
Image
Daripada keadaan politik dalam negara ini, kita telahpun dan sedang memerhati beberapa buah gabungan parti-parti politik yang terkini, iaitu Barisan Nasional (BN) yang kekal begitu lama dengan parti komponen utama Umno memonopoli semua aspek keputusan di dalam gabungan dan kerajaan yang diterajui oleh mereka. Di pihak Pakatan Rakyat (PR) pula ianya merupakan sebuah gabungan parti-parti pembangkang utama, PKR, DAP dan PAS yang bekerjasama secara longgar dan masing-masing mempunyai kedudukan yang setaraf di antara satu sama lain. Di tengah-tengah kancah cabar mencabar di antara BN dan PR, terdapat satu lagi alternatif yang kini sedang menonjol, Gabungan Kiri Malaysia (GKM) yang merangkumi gabungan parti politik bercampur dengan pertubuhan-pertubuhan bukan kerajaan (NGO) yang kini dianggotai oleh Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM), sebagai peneraju utama GKM, diikuti dengan Solidariti Anak Muda Malaysia (SAMM), Pusat Sejarah Rakyat dan Collective Intelligence serta beberapa individu yang te
Read more

Seek for quick success and instant benefits

-
By Soong Phui Jee The people's first reaction to the SMK Sacred Heart's practice of rewarding a brand new Perodua Myvi car to the Best Teacher and Best Student of the school was, would it cause the deterioration of education? After awarding cars today, would they give diamond rings or sport cars tomorrow? Awarding such expensive gifts for students might distort the purpose of education. If children study only to receive gifts and rewards, would they understand the true meaning of studying? Would they study for themselves, or to receive material rewards? In fact, not only the above mentioned school, but many other schools nationwide have gradually tended to seek for quick success and instant benefits. For example, some of the so-called "elite schools" stress much on examination results and refuse to let students with poor results take government examinations to prevent them from pulling down the school's average grade. Shouldn't schools teach all childr
Read more