Pray tell us, what can TPPA offer our people?

-
This article has earlier appeared in Beritadaily.com on 6/1/2016

The negotiations on the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement, or better known by its acronym, TPPA, which includes Malaysia has taken place for about eight years.

Prime Minister Najib Razak also announced in his Budget 2016 speech that Malaysia had agreed in principal to join the US-sponsored trade agreement because of its benefits to our people.

The TPPA is expected to be tabled in parliament on Jan 26, following which a vote will take place in order to set the course for the government to officially endorse the trade agreement which is due to be officially sealed in February 2016.

Much has been said by the government on the goodness of the TPPA but if there are so many goodies in this trade agreement, why hasn’t the government revealed details of them? Why weren't any of the details outlined to the general public if this pact could serve the interest of our people-at-large?

Najib and his government has insisted that there was no reason for Malaysia to walk away from the TPPA right now. He has even outlined in brief some of the benefits of the TPPA in the recently concluded Umno general assembly but did not elaborate on the detailed trade benefits that would really serve the interest of our entire population.

As the endorsement and signing ceremony of the TPPA is approaching, the government has been rushing its effort to convince all parties by outlining the major benefits of the trade agreement.

Uncertainties in government’s efforts

However, the government’s efforts seem to be blurred and uncertain. After so many years of negotiations, this government and its officials are still clueless on how to carry out all the necessary explanations, such as what should be outlined, the impact of TPPA on our people, which segments to focus on, priorities and their real targeted audience.

Until today, there has been still no real public briefings taking place but a more business-structured and corporate kind of briefings have been organised so far, where businesses and corporate leaders have been called upon to participate.

So, are these real public briefings? Can the ordinary people out there really understand the various corporate and trade jargons presented to be only actually understood by business and corporate figures?

The government is busy outlining the benefits that will only serve a small segment of our population, in particular small group of businesses and industries. What the government failed to outline is the impacts of the TPPA that could possibly harm our nation’s sovereignty and the livelihood our people in general.

And if the impacts are potentially negative, such as rising inflation, certain effects on SMEs, labour rights and sanctions of imports from non-TPPA nations, and on what necessary remedies that this government could offer to ease the burden of our people.

Increasing socio-economic concerns

Right now, the political and economic uncertainties have become increasingly worrisome and the majority of our people are mostly concerned about what would become of their livelihood in the near future.

The big question here is, can the TPPA benefit every single man, woman and child as what the government has been claiming?

Then what are these benefits for these people? Can this government go down to the ground to talk to the people, ask them if they have prospered or otherwise, and let them know how this TPPA could help them?

We doubt that! It could be a grave disappointment in the end of the day.

If the people couldn’t get on with existing income, well, as a minister said, just take up two or three jobs.

MITI knows best?

The other question here, is the Ministry of International Trade and Industries (MITI) the only government agency in this nation that has been undertaking the TPPA negotiations?

As far as we know, apart from MITI, there were more that 15 other government ministries, departments, agencies and government-linked companies (GLCs) who had participated in the TPPA negotiations.

So, why only MITI alone has been tasked to brief the entire nation on this trade agreement? Why the other ministries, departments, agencies and GLCs in regards to their respective sectors and fields are not given the same responsibilities to outline the TPPA details to the respective segments of industries?

It is very unfortunate and disappointing that this government has been so disorganised in providing adequate explanations on these issues, and only resorts to condemning and ignoring those who oppose the TPPA by labelling them as “noise makers”.

By the way, will opposing TPPA become a seditious offence in future?

Popular posts from this blog

What has MCA done to the Chinese community in Malaysia?

-
Image
We guess, many of you would be wondering why are we asking such question, “What has MCA done to the Chinese community in Malaysia?” Obviously, none of us would ever realize the real and terrible impact that MCA has made onto the Malaysian Chinese and if they were to see this, the definite question too would be, “done what?”, “don’t know”, “not aware”, “none of our business”, or even, “we don't want to know at all”. The inception of MCA in 1949 can be traced back from the origins of the Chinese Kuomintang (KMT) and its chapter in the then Malaya, which was famously known as Kuomintang Malaya (KMT Malaya). In aftermath of the Second World War and the defeat of the KMT forces in China in 1949, the KMT Malaya has began to move towards transforming its Malayan chapter into a local Chinese based organization in order to preserve its existence and long term political opportunity in this county. And this is how MCA was born in February 1949, where the party later teamed up
Read more

Perlukah sesebuah gabungan parti politik kekal secara wajib?

-
Image
Daripada keadaan politik dalam negara ini, kita telahpun dan sedang memerhati beberapa buah gabungan parti-parti politik yang terkini, iaitu Barisan Nasional (BN) yang kekal begitu lama dengan parti komponen utama Umno memonopoli semua aspek keputusan di dalam gabungan dan kerajaan yang diterajui oleh mereka. Di pihak Pakatan Rakyat (PR) pula ianya merupakan sebuah gabungan parti-parti pembangkang utama, PKR, DAP dan PAS yang bekerjasama secara longgar dan masing-masing mempunyai kedudukan yang setaraf di antara satu sama lain. Di tengah-tengah kancah cabar mencabar di antara BN dan PR, terdapat satu lagi alternatif yang kini sedang menonjol, Gabungan Kiri Malaysia (GKM) yang merangkumi gabungan parti politik bercampur dengan pertubuhan-pertubuhan bukan kerajaan (NGO) yang kini dianggotai oleh Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM), sebagai peneraju utama GKM, diikuti dengan Solidariti Anak Muda Malaysia (SAMM), Pusat Sejarah Rakyat dan Collective Intelligence serta beberapa individu yang te
Read more

Seek for quick success and instant benefits

-
By Soong Phui Jee The people's first reaction to the SMK Sacred Heart's practice of rewarding a brand new Perodua Myvi car to the Best Teacher and Best Student of the school was, would it cause the deterioration of education? After awarding cars today, would they give diamond rings or sport cars tomorrow? Awarding such expensive gifts for students might distort the purpose of education. If children study only to receive gifts and rewards, would they understand the true meaning of studying? Would they study for themselves, or to receive material rewards? In fact, not only the above mentioned school, but many other schools nationwide have gradually tended to seek for quick success and instant benefits. For example, some of the so-called "elite schools" stress much on examination results and refuse to let students with poor results take government examinations to prevent them from pulling down the school's average grade. Shouldn't schools teach all childr
Read more